Financial analysis of a FTSE company

Assignment details and instructions

You work for the Salford Investment Bank. You have been asked to appraise the possibility of making a small-scale investment in a selected FTSE100 company. You are to provide a report to

the board to evidence your conclusions. The SIB is keen to invest in companies that are not only financially responsible, but also value sustainability, as the Bank is keen to be a responsible

investor.

The chosen FTSE 100 company should come from the London Stock Exchange, see

 https://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-

 markets/stocks/indices/summary/summary-indices-constituents.html?index=UKX

Do not choose a bank or financial institution. Your report should contain the following:

  • An introduction to your chosen company, and the reason why this company, and the competitor, has been chosen;
  • Critical analysis of the performance of your chosen company, comparing the most recent financial statements to the prior year, and a chosen competitor;
  • Critical analysis of the cash flows of your chosen company, comparing the most recent financial statements to the prior year, and a chosen competitor;
  • Critical analysis of reasons for changes in investor information, comparing the most recent financial statements to the prior year, and a chosen competitor along with an analysis of movements in share price of your chosen company since the date of the latest financial statements, until 30th October 2020;
  • A discussion on the sustainability reporting of your chosen company, and how this compares to competitors; and
  • A conclusion on whether you would recommend investment in your chosen company

 

Your report will be 2,000 words maximum (excluding references and ratio appendix). This is subject to a 10% grace (over or under).

 

Assessment Criteria

You should look at the performance descriptors below to find out what we are specifically looking at during the assessment.

Performance descriptors (10% bands):

Extremely Poor (0-9%)

Totally inadequate demonstration of required knowledge. Not able to link theory to practice. No demonstration of analysis, evaluation or synthesis of performance, cash flow or investor information and share price movements. No analysis of sustainability. Unsatisfactory professional judgement. Presentation is extremely poor. Work has no structure or clarity. Extremely poor use of language. No attempt to provide evidence of sources used.

Very Poor (10-19%)

Virtually no relevant knowledge demonstrated. Fails to adequately demonstrate links between theory and practice. No meaningful analysis or evaluation of performance, cash flow, investor information and sustainability. Arguments presented are inappropriate and very poorly linked. Very poor professional judgement. Presentation is very poor. Work has little discernible structure or clarity. Very poor use of language. Lack of ability to source adequate material. Very poor referencing.

Poor (20-29%)

Inconsistent or inaccurate knowledge. Limited and inappropriate or inaccurate links between theory and practice. Descriptive occasionally attempts to analyse or evaluate performance, cash flow, investor information and sustainability but lacks critical approach. Confusion and/ or weakness in argument. Identifies issues but lacks evidence of reflective processes. Poor professional judgement. Presentation is poor. Work is disorganised and lacks clarity. Poor use of language. Poor use of reference material. Inappropriate or out-dated sources with numerous referencing errors.

Inadequate (30-39%)

Limited evidence of knowledge. Inappropriate links between theory and practice. Mainly descriptive evidence of analysis, inconsistent critical approach, little evaluation or synthesis of performance, cash flow, investor information and sustainability. Follows processes of reflection but fails to demonstrate insight. Inconsistent and/ or inaccurate professional judgement. Presentation is unsatisfactory. Work is limited in terms of structure, coherence and clarity. Limitations in academic style. Unsatisfactory referencing with frequent error. Limited ability to support content with relevant sources.

Unsatisfactory (40-49%)

Basic knowledge with occasional inaccuracies appropriate yet basic integration of theory and practice. Critical analysis evident, with some evaluation and synthesis of performance, cash flow, investor information and sustainability, although limited. Limited evidence of reflection. Some appropriate academic argument although not well applied and lacking in clarity. Unsatisfactory professional judgement. Presentation of work is unsatisfactory in terms of structure, coherence, clarity and academic style. Some inconsistencies. Some grammar and syntax errors which detract from the content. Narrow range of sources. Referencing in presented work is unsatisfactory with some inconsistencies or inaccuracies. References used are inappropriate in terms of currency.

 

 

 

 

Satisfactory (50-59%)

Mostly accurate knowledge with satisfactory depth and breadth of knowledge. Sound integration of theory and practice. Sound critical analysis and evaluation of performance, cash flow, investor information and sustainability. Relevant academic argument. Demonstrates basic ability of synthesise information in order to formulate appropriate conclusions. Presentation of work is satisfactory in terms of structure coherence, clarity and academic style. But some inconsistencies in grammar and syntax. Satisfactory range of sources identified with appropriate referencing and few inaccuracies. Appropriate use of primary and secondary sources.

Good (60-69%)

Consistently relevant accurate knowledge with good depth and breadth. Clear and relevant application of theory to practice. Clear, in depth critical analysis, evaluation of performance, cash flow, investor information and sustainability. Clear academic argument with synthesis of different ideas and perspectives. Presentation of work is well organised with good use of language to express ideas/argument. Very few inconsistencies; grammar and syntax good. Satisfactory range of sources identified with appropriate referencing and few inaccuracies. Appropriate use of primary and secondary sources.

Very Good (70-79%)

Comprehensive knowledge demonstrating very good depth and breadth. Clear insight into links between theory and practice. Demonstrates ability to transfer knowledge between different contexts appropriately. Very good analysis and synthesis of performance, cash flow, investor information and sustainability with evidence of critique and independent thought. Demonstrates ability to make sound decisions in complex and unpredictable contexts. Presentation is of a very good standard. Very good grammar and syntax. Clear evidence of referencing to a wide range of primary and secondary sources which are used effectively in supporting the work.

Excellent (80-89%)

Integrates the complexity of a range of knowledge and excellent understanding of it’s relevance. Excellent depth of knowledge in a variety of contexts. Coherent and systematic application of theory to practice. Excellent critical analysis and synthesis of performance, cash flow, investor information and sustainability. Arguments handled skilfully with imaginative interpretation of material. Willingness to challenge self and practice. Presentation is excellent, well-structured and logical. Excellent grammar and syntax. Detailed use of predominantly primary sources which are well referenced.

Outstanding (90-100%)

Outstanding knowledge. Theory is linked to practice to an exceptional level. Outstanding critical analysis and synthesis of performance, cash flow, investor information and sustainability. Presentation is outstanding demonstrating a fluent academic style. Synthesis of reference material from a wide range of sources both within and across professions

HelpHub
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Choose HelpHub

HelpHub

Quality Researched Papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

HelpHub

Qualified Writers

We have hired a team of professional writers experienced in academic and business writing. Most of them are native speakers and PhD holders able to take care of any assignment you need help with.

StudyAcer

Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account.

StudyAcer

On Time Delivery

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. We will always strive to deliver on time.

StudyAcer

Original & Confidential

We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text.

StudyAcer

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Help Hub

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Help Hub

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Help Hub

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

HelpHub Writing Services

No need to work on essay at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of essay writing services.

HelpHub HelpHub

Essays

Essay Writing Service

No matter what kind of academic paper you need and how urgent you need it, you are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper at an affordable price. We take care of all your paper needs and give a 24/7 customer care support system.

HelpHub HelpHub

Admissions

Admission Essays

An admission essay is an essay or other written statement by a candidate, often a potential student enrolling in a college, university, or graduate school. You can be rest assurred that through our service we will write the best admission essay for you.

HelpHub HelpHub

Editing

Editing Support

Our academic writers and editors make the necessary changes to your paper so that it is polished. We also format your document by correctly quoting the sources and creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

HelpHub HelpHub

Revision

Revision Support

If you think your paper could be improved, you can request a review. In this case, your paper will be checked by the writer or assigned to an editor. You can use this option as many times as you see fit. This is free because we want you to be completely satisfied.